SEED-dating for scientists and designers

Feb
11

A networking event followed the NOBELini: Blind Data private view on Thursday 11th February 2010 inviting scientists and designers to seed ideas for science-design projects.

(Photos by Cléon Daniels)

After watching Holly Stead’s short film edit, Two Cultures, which documents the NOBELini project, participants each wrote down 4 words on a post-it note to reflect their interests. Designers and scientists took it in turn to choose post-it notes from the board and find their owners. Brainstorming, if fruitful, seeded ideas, which were documented on SEED cards. Finally, SEED cards were displayed and participants voted (with heart post-it notes) for their favourite idea(s).

Based on the responses we received, 93% of participants enjoyed SEED dating. 87% found it personally useful and 47% professionally useful. Comments in this regard include:

“Really refreshing, enabled me to think about my work in a different way”

“Always good to look beyond your own subject”

73% of respondents were happy with the way the event was organised. Comments for ways to improve the event include:

“Short intros from everyone then general melée”

“More time to chat”

“Clearer instructions, fewer instructions at a time”

“Publicise more, more information on website, ask people to send forth ideas”

87% of respondents said they would like to participate again in a similar event and 53% said they would follow-up on the new contacts they had made.

Words that scientists and designers used to describe their interests include:

“Narrative”
“Metamythemagic”
“Communication”
“Sustainable”
“Vision”
“Dancing”
“Absurdity”
“Pattern”
“Worms on prozac”
“Brain”
“Nature”
“Neuroscience”
“Cells”
“Knowledge”
“Life”

The question: What would you design if anything were scientifically possible?

SEEDs and their love-heart scores are tabulated below:

By (scientist and designer) SEED idea Love heart score
(Lieven and Fernanda) “A biological external hard-drive to access lost memory in patients with Alzheimer’s.” 8
(Nandita) “The tangible self: what if we could decode our daydreams? If we could map out individual thoughts and innermost desires we could simplify decision-making.” 7
(Shirin and Stacey) “Use of scent in memory loss to target memory neurons” 4
(Fauzia and Fernanda) “Make all scientific theories visually accessible: tactile and/or sensory” 3
(Natalie and Heather) “White blood cell model for disaster relief” 3
Brenda and Fernanda) “Everything that is destroyed becomes something new and useful?” 3
(Brenda and Heather) “Personal algal growth pods for energy” 3
(Stephen and Jana) “A human brain composed of hundreds of worms” 2
(Fauzia and Heather) “Crystal cities inspired by microscopic structures” 2
(Shirin and Stacey) “A wearable record of life/memory/experience” 1
(Stefan and Stephanie) “Self assembling seating in old people’s homes that changes configuration every day. Each seat recognizes the individual and their medical/emotional needs.” 1
(Shirin and Olivia) “Remote-controlled cell-growth” 1
(Emily and Andree) “An instant interactive electronic forum for dissemination information about discovery—signaling advances across disciplines” 1/2
(Anon) “A quantum computer to predict the lottery results” 1/2
(Anon) “Recycle our CO2 for plant/algal consumption” 0
(Jenny and Jana) “Aid for blind people that projects a camera/computer-rendered image directly into the brain” 0
(Brenda and Stephanie) “Natural systems for man-made jobs” 0
(John and Fernanda) “A way to visualize and understand fantasies” 0
(Stefan and David) “Bacterially-driven power generation” 0
(Stefan and Kostya) “Retune wavelengths to increase energy output for power generation” 0

Final comments from respondents included:

“Missed out being on email list of participants”

“The chance factor is most interesting because it creates new challenges”

“Really interesting people, designers receptive and everyone I met very interesting”

“Any non-scientist has been exposed to so many different ideas, it must inspire them”

 

Comments are closed.